Forensic psychiatry & mental health law

Psychiatry & Law Radar

Thu 10 SepCASE

Headlines are the editor's. Summaries are machine-written and staff reviewed. Nothing here is legal or clinical advice.

Staff reviewed

EMILY A. BICKFORD V. MATTHEW A. BRADEEN

— STAFF
We instead conclude that courts may always use the best-interest standard to allocate parental rights between two parents, and that the Constitution protects the religious rights of parents by prohibiting religious bias or hostility from influencing a court’s best-interest analysis.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · affirmed

Whether strict scrutiny, not the best-interest standard, governs allocating religious decision-making between parents.

2026 ME 94