Staff reviewed
GABRIEL V. STATE OF FLORIDA
— STAFF
Suffice it to say, we find that the evidence in this case was sufficient for the court to inform the jury that AMC was not a defense, especially in light of Gabriel’s own characterization of the evidence that he was “incoherent and terrified out of his mind” at the time of the offense.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · affirmed
Whether lay evidence of incoherence, without expert testimony, supports instructing jurors that abnormal mental condition is not a defense.
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10980529/gabriel-v-state-of-florida/