EUCEDA V. UNITED STATES

Staff reviewed

— STAFF

With respect to the third claim, Mr. Euceda forfeited it in the trial court, and we see no plain error by the trial court. We therefore affirm the denial of Mr. Euceda’s IRAA motion.

D.C. Ct. App. · affirmed

Whether a court ruling on a youth sentence-reduction motion must expressly weigh the movant's age at the offense as a mitigating factor.

https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/11007635/euceda-v-united-states/