Staff reviewed
DESCRIPTIVE, NOT CATEGORICAL: HOW COURT QUESTIONS SHAPE FUNCTIONAL EXPERT CONCLUSIONS IN ADULT CAPACITY CASES.
— STAFF
It gives a concrete taxonomy of what courts actually ask capacity examiners and a defensible argument, backed by domestic appellate criticism and international disability-rights standards, for answering descriptively rather than with a global capacity verdict — useful to anyone drafting or receiving capacity referrals. But it is a two-region Czech document analysis with no binding effect and no evidence of downstream impact, so it changes no obligation and undermines no established assessment method.