Staff reviewed
EXAMINING THE COURT'S PERSPECTIVE: LEGAL PROFESSIONALS' PERCEPTIONS AND PREFERENCES OF EXPERT TESTIMONY.
— STAFF
It updates a stale evidence base on what the audience for forensic testimony actually wants, and documents a cross-border divergence in professional preference that bears on retention and on how a report is framed for a given bench. It changes no obligation and no claim an evaluator can defend as valid; it describes consumer preference, from a self-selected sample of 132, so it informs presentation rather than method.