Staff reviewed
EPISTEMIC INJUSTICE AND PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE USERS: THE DENIAL OF CAPACITY AS A SPECIAL EPISTEMIC HARM.
— STAFF
It gives a vocabulary — testimonial injustice, epistemic standing — that increasingly appears in ethics briefing and in argument about capacity determinations, so a reader may encounter the framing in a report or a hearing. But nothing here alters the legal test for capacity, what an evaluator must document, or what an expert can defensibly assert, and no data are offered against which existing practice could be measured.