Forensic psychiatry & mental health law

Psychiatry & Law Radar

Wed 16 SepCASE

Headlines are the editor's. Summaries are machine-written and staff reviewed. Nothing here is legal or clinical advice.

Staff reviewed

STATE V. FOMO

— STAFF
Under the circumstances of this case, we have a fair assurance that the admission of the challenged testimony did not substantially affect the jury’s verdict.

Conn. Sup. Ct. · affirmed

Whether admitting an undisclosed police witness's expert testimony defining "grooming" in a child sexual abuse trial was harmful error.

https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10973687/state-v-fomo/